New CD by Incognito

topic posted Fri, November 26, 2004 - 6:38 PM by  Lyle
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Has anyone heard the new CD by Incognito: "Adventures in Black Sunshine" ?
posted by:
Lyle
SF Bay Area
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: New CD by Incognito

    Sat, November 27, 2004 - 12:26 AM
    I just listened to some tracks on a site that streams full-length tracks.

    Not bad. Hardly Acid Jazz. More like Easy Listening/Pop/R&B.

    I'm glad to see that they brought back the female vocalist. She really made the Tribes.. album shine.
    • Re: New CD by Incognito

      Sat, November 27, 2004 - 12:39 AM
      you mean maysa leak?
      they always work with female vocalists.

      while i'll admit that bluey does tend more toward the "softer" side of things, who would you consider *more* acid-jazz?

      that's an honest question, not a challenge.
      • Re: New CD by Incognito

        Sat, November 27, 2004 - 1:15 AM
        > you mean maysa leak?

        Yep.

        > who would you consider *more* acid-jazz?

        Dunno...

        I spose Us3's Cantaloop always comes to mind...

        I just read a bunch of pages and they all talk about groove-oriented jazz or jazz with a funky beat. They all mention that the genre goes back to the original classics. I was enjoying trying to 'own' Acid Jazz as a genre of our generation but now I understand that is wrong.

        I think we can still lay claim to the genre of nu-jazz though. :)
        • Re: New CD by Incognito

          Sat, November 27, 2004 - 2:49 AM
          <I was enjoying trying to 'own' Acid Jazz as a genre of our generation but now I understand that is wrong.>

          i don't understand why you think that's wrong. the person that coined the term (gilles peterson) is only about 6years older than you.

          acid-jazz to me was always more of a mentality, really, than a genre. by the time there were "acid-jazz" sections in stores they had codified it into music that was kinda stiff & lifeless. the mentality is soulful eclecticism, and the people that started the "acid-jazz" movement are still practicing the same mentality, they just don't use that phrase any longer.

          take a look at some of these tracklistings:
          www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/urba...rchive.shtml

          same mentality as before.

          <I think we can still lay claim to the genre of nu-jazz though. :)>

          nu-jazz is made by the same people that were (or would have been) making acid-jazz in the 90s.

          ex: agent k (kaidi tatham) is the same keyboardist that was on herbaliser's "remedies" from the 90s. he's now part of the bugz in the attic family.

          jazzanova has a tune called "fedime's flight" that's been around since at least 97, before the term "nu-jazz" existed.
          • Acid Jazz definitions

            Mon, November 29, 2004 - 12:41 PM
            Hmm..
            Wikipedia seems to describe Acid Jazz as mostly live and Nu-Jazz as Jazz/Electronica fusion. Here are the clips:

            From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

            Acid jazz (sometimes groove jazz) is a musical genre that combines jazz influences with elements of soul music, funk, disco and hip hop. It developed over the 1980s and 1990s and could be seen as taking the boundary crossing of jazz fusion onto new ground. Largely initiated in London and gaining the name from the Acid Jazz record label, pioneering groups were Jamiroquai, Incognito, Galliano, Brand New Heavies, James Taylor Quartet, Young Disciples and Corduroy.

            In the United States notable acid-jazz groups are: Groove Collective and Solsonics. Other more recent artists and groups who have produced music in this genre include Mother Earth, Mr. Scruff, and Praful.

            A typical acid jazz group would consist of a rhythm section built round bass guitar, electric guitar and drums, a horn section (trumpets, saxophones, trombones, etc) tied together by some kind of keyboard instrument (providing either rhythmic support or ambient sound effects) and vocals.

            Nu-jazz (sometimes electro-jazz) was coined in the late 1990s to refer to styles which combine jazz textures and sometimes jazz instrumentation with electronic music. Like the term electronica, nu jazz is a loosely defined umbrella musical style. It ranges from the infusion of live instrumentation to house beats of jazz house exemplified by French St Germain and German Jazzanova ; to more band-based improvised jazz with electronic elements such as that of the British Cinematic Orchestra, and the Norwegian future jazz style pioneered by Bugge Wesseltoft.

            Nu-jazz typically ventures farther into the electronic territory than does its close cousin, acid jazz (or groove jazz), which is generally closer to earthier funk, soul and rhythm and blues, although releases from noted groove jazz artists such as the Groove Collective blur the distinction between the styles.

            Thoughts? Do these pretty much peg it?
            • Re: Acid Jazz definitions

              Mon, November 29, 2004 - 3:03 PM
              <Thoughts? Do these pretty much peg it?>

              no. i don't mean to come off as some know-it-all, but i feel like the person that wrote that wasn't part of the scene(s) they're writing about--i was. well, i wasn't in london at all, but i read about the scene there and nyc and was part of the 2nd generation here in l.a. i put on events, dj'ed and attended other events that were part of the acid-jazz scene here. generally, if i didn't attend an event i know someone that was part of it.

              my responses:

              <Acid jazz (sometimes groove jazz) is a musical genre that combines jazz influences with elements of soul music, funk, disco and hip hop.>

              while i take issue with the term "groove jazz" (jazz was groovin' long before acid-jazz) every thing there is accurate except they're not accounting for things like "funky or soul"-jazz from the 60s & 70s. maybe they're implying it, but if you don't know jazz history then you might not get that. many londoners tended to think of "acid-jazz" (at the time) as what we now call "rare-groove"--old funky jazz tunes played as dance music.

              <Largely initiated in London and gaining the name from the Acid Jazz record label>

              you remember me talking about gilles peterson coining the term? he and eddie piller founded and ran this label. he later moved on to form "talkin' loud" (named for the james brown tune.)

              <Young Disciples>

              this group's music was sample-based--the main 2 guys were djs. in addition to them was singer/lyricist carleen anderson (niece of vicki anderson--a james brown associate/employee.) they added the skills of mick talbot & steve white (keys & drums respectively from the highly influential group led by paul weller called *the style council.*) btw, young disciples were on the talkin' loud label.

              a good compilation series to give you an idea of what the music was like in acid-jazz clubs back in the heyday 90s is "totally wired" on the acid-jazz label. it's a mix of old music, "new music" and the "retro" stuff that was a large part of the movement.

              part of the issue i take with their view is that they don't really give any credit to the djs that really started the whole scene. talk to anyone that's a real veteran of the scene, and they'll tell you that it wasn't primarily band-driven like the wikipedia people seem to be saying--it was a dj scene first. the djs are the ones who made the connections between the (at first) pre-existing music (when it was a primarily retro-scene) and then began to produce new music using elements of the old music they loved--samples and working with musicians/singers. even snowboy--who primarily is known for doing latin music and is a percussionist--is a dj.

              <A typical acid jazz group would consist... (snip) >

              acid-jazz compilations from the period in question fly in the face of this. it was BOTH live and programmed/sampled music. that's one of the reasons it is so hard to define what acid-jazz is--it's not just one thing.

              <Nu-jazz typically ventures farther into the electronic territory than does its close cousin, acid jazz (or groove jazz), which is generally closer to earthier funk, soul and rhythm and blues, although releases from noted groove jazz artists such as the Groove Collective blur the distinction between the styles.>

              hrm...

              from my experience, nu-jazz was coined to refer to the stuff that was more influenced by jazz than the soul or funk stuff, but wasn't necessarily ANY more electronic. for instance most of the nu-jazz stuff that i've heard is an attempt to sound more organic, really. consequently, i wasn't as interested in a lot of it because it wasn't as dance-oriented. the other thing is that "acid-jazz" as a term was dead with the jazz-dance (my preferred term) cognascenti. if you were to refer to gilles peterson, patrick forge, or any of the other leading lights of that scene as "acid-jazz" after about 96 or 97, they would bristle. the term "future funk" was becoming popular then, but it was even more inaccurate than "acid-jazz" so it wasn't long for this world either...

              really the bible of this whole scene was/(is?) a magazine called "straight no chaser."

              www.dustygroove.com/snc.htm

              i think that's enough for now. no-one wants to read a novella of "acid-jazz--the t-bird opinion" or do they? :)
              • Re: Acid Jazz definitions

                Mon, November 29, 2004 - 11:52 PM
                >> i think that's enough for now. no-one wants to read a novella of "acid-jazz--the t-bird opinion" or do they? :)

                Well...Wikipedia IS supposed to be interactive....
                Feel free to positively express your opinion over there. That's what it's all about. :)

                Thanks for all of the info. I'm going to go check out snc...